'Delhi High Court Condemns Kejriwal for Prioritizing Personal Gain over Public Interest
The Delhi High Court has severely criticized Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister of Delhi, for his refusal to resign following his arrest in connection with the Delhi liquor policy case. The court expressed dismay that Kejriwal had chosen to prioritize his personal interests over the welfare of the city.
AAP Government Accused of Neglecting Education
The court also reprimanded the AAP-led Delhi government for its failure to provide textbooks and uniforms to students in government schools. The court observed that the government seemed indifferent to the plight of underprivileged students who lacked essential learning materials.
'Your client is only interested in power,' the court remarked. 'I don't know how much power you desire.'
Standing Committee Absence Hinders School Supplies Distribution
The court noted that the non-formation of Standing Committees had hindered the distribution of essential school supplies, including notebooks, stationery, uniforms, and school bags. The MCD Commissioner had previously highlighted this issue, emphasizing that the Standing Committee had sole authority to award contracts exceeding five crores.
Kejriwal's Consent Required for Delegation of Financial Power
In response to the court's inquiry about financial delegation in the absence of Standing Committees, the Delhi government's counsel informed the court that the Chief Minister's consent would be necessary. This revelation drew sharp criticism from the court.
'It's your decision to maintain the government with the Chief Minister in custody,' the court stated. 'You are compelling us to adopt measures we intended to avoid.'
Urban Development Minister Accused of Neglect
The court further accused Urban Development Minister Saurabh Bhardwaj of ignoring the plight of students and shedding 'crocodile tears.'
Court Expresses Frustration with Government's Failure
While acknowledging that distributing books is not typically the court's responsibility, the court expressed frustration with the government's inaction.
'We have to perform this task because someone is failing in their duty,' the court lamented.'
